Lesage, Paris

If the name Lesage doesn’t get your heart beating, please leave now. This legendary house, started in 1924, when the embroiderer Michonet sold his house to Marie-Louise and Albert Lesage, is one of six remaining embroidery houses in Paris. The Metiers d’art, or craftsmen, are the ones responsible for the couture you see every season. The costume jewelers, feather workers, milliners, bookmakers, glove makers, fabric pleaters, and embroiderers are the ones who make the exquisite pieces you see on the couture runways (under the designers direction, of course).

 Chanel Sketches

Lesage is perhaps the most famous because of it’s work with Chanel. Yes, it is the house that embroiders Chanel. But Lesage has worked with many other legendary designers, Yves Saint Laurent and Elsa Schiaparelli being two (they still have samples from Elsa-all the way back to the 1930’s!)

They also work with new and emerging designers, Mary Katrantzou being the most notable. As a side note, I am obsessed with her, and was almost more excited to see a garden-print dress being embellished than a tweed being made.

Lesage has over 60 tons of materials, and only 60 employees. Everything is stored beautifully, right down to the color-coded thread in antique shelves. They also have an incredible archive- every time they make a sample it is put into their archive, so they have amassed quite the collection after almost 90 years.

One of the best parts was learning about how the designers collaborate with the craftspeople- designers will come and give the theme, and then the craftsperson will create samples based on the theme and what they think the designer is looking for. The designer will then pick their favorite, and a series of drawings and patterns and samples are made. Once the embroidery is complete, the pieces go back to their respective fashion houses and are assembled there. Pretty cool, right?

FN Summit: Let’s Talk Shoes


Photo by John Aquino, WWD
Tabitha Simmons, Alessandra Lavin, and Laurence Dacade are three of the most prominent women in footwear today (if only Charlotte Olympia has been there…) and all three of them love luxury.
Photo by John Aquino, WWD
Tabitha Simmons, a former model and a fashion stylist for magazines such as American and Italian Vogue, is making a serious impression on the fashion industry, especially since she just won the CFDA Swarovski award for Emerging Talent in Accessory Design. Since launching in 2009, the brand has grown into quite an impressive luxury business that makes genuinely beautiful yet cool shoes, which are sold at over 6o locations. She is careful to grow her business slowly and “organically…one step at a time.” Her biggest challenges, though, in the business are “production, and getting it into stores on time.” She ultimately would love to have a store, because “then you really connect to your customer.” She loves collaborating with designers, like Creatures of the Wind, for runway shows, as it’s “fun, and a great way to grow with them. You support each other, it’s nice.” Nice indeed, almost nicer than that CFDA award.
Photos Courtesy of Aperlai
Alessandra Lanvin believes that female shoe designers have an advantage over their male counterparts, since men tend to fantasize more about heels, and not take into account a woman’s comfort, while women do. Alessandra founded Aperlai (named for the ancient Lycian city), a luxury accessory line, almost three years ago, though she holds degrees in Political Science and Art History. It is fitting, then, that most of her inspiration comes from Artists; favorites include Picasso, Pollack, and Mondrian. The modern styles of these artists are clearly represented in Ms. Lanvin’s shoe designs- her shoes often include such elements as graphic lines, asymmetries, and contrasts. She often uses exotic skins such as python and pony, and all her shoes are made in Italy. Her main focus will always be on footwear, though she is open to expanding, but just a little bit. “Aperlai is a small brand, and we want to remain as such,” she stated, and added that with all the big luxury shoe companies out there, it is hardly wise to try and compete. 

Photos Courtesy of Laurence Dacade
Laurence Dacade is certainly the envy of most everyone, for she has collaborated with Karl Lagerfeld for Chanel. That’s pretty much the ultimate. She likes Karl a lot, and likes that he “knows exactly what he wants, he’s quick, he’s talented, and professional…” she shares in a thick French accent that she actually apologized for, which made her Parisian charm that much charmier, “everyday it’s a great moment (with him).” So though she loves him, and who wouldn’t love working for Chanel? She doesn’t just want to be known for her (amazing) collaborations. She wants to be known for her own line as well, she wants the client to be happy, and she wants to “fight for the idea that you don’t have to fight to wear heels,” that is, they should be comfortable. I’m liking her more and more. She loves designing, loves to work on the heel, the proportion, the fabric, and loves shoes in general. She went into footwear because, plain and simple, she loves shoes, and she gives them everything she’s got.
These three women were so inspiring, they are successful, beautiful, talented, and all around pretty amazing.

Couture Round Up, Day 1


This also could be titled:
“Why is everyone so into flowers and giant headpieces and giant flower headpieces?”

I don’t usually do a lot of fashion-show-reviewing, since there are so many other people that do that, and probably do it better. However! Couture time is my most favorite time of the year, and the clothes are too beautiful (usually) to not review. So I shall. And if you don’t want to read my opinion, then just look at the pretty pictures.



Up First: Versace



While everyone else has been busy freaking out about Versace for H&M, Donatella has been busy freaking out over her new Atelier Versace show (I use the term freaking out loosely, I’m sure she was not, by any means, freaking out in the same way the public did for what she did at H&M). Atelier Versace is nothing new, Angelina Jolie made sure we knew that at the Golden Globes last week. But there has not been a couture show in Paris since 2004, and for the first one in 8 years, Donatella did a good job. Quintessentially Versace, with the right mix of sportiness and sexiness. Lines were exaggerated with the help of some sort of metal something, which brought a little 80’s back into it. Colors ranged from a subtle light grayish-purple to neon yellows, oranges, and greens, and of course, some gold. Though these dresses are meant more for a red carpet than a runway, and the shoes were a bit chunky, the presentation was still a fabulous return to the Paris Couture Shows. 

This, um, piece, though not a red-carpet-worthy dress, is awesome if only because of Lindsey Wixson’s pose. Which almost redeems her falling on her last Versace runway.



I am a big fan of Alexis Mabille, particularly in his couture collections. But this couture season around, my eyes got so distracted by the ginourmous poufs of a flower on top of the models head, which was painted the same color as the flower, which was the same color as the outfit. I commend him for really going into the whole color thing head on (literally) but I found the headwear to be too distracting and the face paint a little jarring. Once I got over that though, I did like what he did, especially seeing as he used basically no black or white in the show, which is pretty impressive. Looking at all the outfits together, it looks like a big, fashionable rainbow, which is not something we see a lot, especially in couture. My love of the color aside, I wasn’t too fond of all the shiny fabrics, or fond of some of the more matte fabrics either, and some of the dresses I found a little overdone. But the clothing was still beautiful, and those colors still dazzling. 

I’m super loving this color.
Save for the lace at the bottom, I sort of like this.



Christophe Josse has been quietly working in couture since the early 2000’s, first as assistants at various houses, then showing couture under his own name in July 2005. In January 2006 the designer was invited by the Chmabre Syndicale de la Haute Couture (or, the lawmakers of couture) to show during the official Haute Couture shows, but only as an “invited member”. At this time last year, the federation promoted him from guest member to permanent member, which allows his brand to bear the exclusive “haute Couture” label. (Side Note: as I’m sure we all know, being a couturier under french law is extremely difficult, as they have such rigid standards). 
His show today was full of black and white and pink and purple and little cocktail dresses and floating, beautifully draped fabrics and stiffer fabrics and some shininess and some draping and some structure and some longer gowns and some sheer panels and green and yellow and ponies and rainbows and unicorns. The clothing, while so beautiful, was a little all over the place. There were gorgeous flowing gowns in all colors, including one purple and white printed number, which didn’t really seem to fit in, though it was one of my favorite pieces. Some dresses were a little stiffer, more structure and tailored. There was one that looked like tinsel. There was a light blue number with pockets and jewels (one of only a few dresses to use gems) and another light blueish number strangely reminiscent of McQueen in terms of technique, silhouette, and decoration. The clothing, again, was beautiful, but the collection was a little to small to showcase such a wide range; the pieces jumped from one to the next instead of flowing smoothly. But I would wear about half of the collection, even if it doesn’t go together all at once.

Christophe Josse photos from nymag.com


To say Dior’s first post-Galliano show was a little bit of a disaster is putting it mildly, but Bill Gaytten’s success this season almost makes up for it. After Galliano was dismissed with little time left before the couture show, the responsibility fell to Bill Gaytten, who, after working under Galliano for 16 years, would presumably know how to do things. However the result was not a good one, and Dior is pretty hard to mess up. The silhouettes and shapes are so ingrained in the minds of the fashion world that it is nearly impossible to think of Dior without thinking of those silhouettes originally created by Christian Dior himself back in 1947. Perhaps it was this old knowledge that allowed the fashion world to see past the theatrics of the show and still love Dior, giving Gaytten another chance at stepping up to the plate of couture. 
And it’s a good thing they did (well, it’s not like there was much of a choice, as no replacement for Galliano has been found thus far). Gaytten brought Dior Couture back to it’s roots with a bang, or in this case, an x-rated bang. The full skirts and fitted tops were back. The crazy prints, extra fabric, and geometric head things were gone, and in their place stood the classic silhouettes and ladylike beauty of the Dior we all know and love, but with a saucy twist. Sheer fabrics gave a glimpse inside the clothes, showing their machinery (and the models machinery as well). Past the sheerness though, were beautiful, classic clothes brought up to date a bit. Gaytten’s collection had the feeling of a designer who has just shown his first show at a new house, when he works more cautiously and takes less risks than he might in the future. A promising ‘start’, he left the fashion world wondering just what’s going to happen next.

It should be said that this is not real crocodile, but ostrich skin irregularly cut and hand sewn to organdy and tulle. 
Giambattista Valli

For the label’s second couture show, I’d say job very well done. Sophisticated, clean, lady-like, polished, and beautiful are all words that come to mind when thinking of this collection. Though mostly black and white, the textures made it seem as though it had more than just a handful of colors. (Though the flowers did bring about all-too-recent memories of his first couture collection, which could be a positive or negative thing…)The mix of said textures was incredible, between the lace and the flowers and the sparkles and the patent leather, there was no shortage of black and white excitement. Not to discredit the ‘simpler’ pieces, in fact, some of the most successful outfits, were only one color, but they still stood out for their shapes and materials. There was a hint of naughtiness (perhaps he and Bill Gaytten conferenced and decided that now was the time to show underpinnings, for if not now, when?) in the sheer materials and black panties, but the effect was chic instead of cheap, a hard thing to achieve with visible underwear. But Valli did it, and did it well.
 
Everyone’s lovin the croc. (Thanks, Marc.)
 

Gorgeous.


All photos via Style.com